Stanford Report: AI Insiders and Everyone Else Are Drifting Apart

A Stanford report uses data to depict a rift: the gap between AI practitioners' expectations, trust, and optimism about the technology and the public's is so wide it's like living in two worlds.

What the Report Quantified

The survey compared the attitudes of AI insiders and the general public on a series of questions: the pace of technological progress, the impact on jobs, views on regulation, and optimism about the future. On nearly every one, the two groups stand at opposite ends of the distribution: insiders find the transformation exciting and broadly positive, while the public's dominant sentiment is worry and powerlessness. More noteworthy is the trend—this rift is widening year over year rather than narrowing, and the more the technology advances, the further apart the two sides' narratives become.

The Cost of the Disconnect

Products are made by insiders, but it's outsiders who pay, vote, and take to the streets. The tech industry has suffered the same before: social media went from universally adored to universally reviled in just a few years, and that cognitive rift was the precursor. AI's current situation looks a lot like it—internally immersed in the excitement of capability leaps, externally accumulating a sense of offense. The report itself offers no solution, but it nails the problem to the data: if an industry tells stories only to its own, the public will eventually cut in with regulation and boycott.

via: Hacker News