Turn Source Material into a Verifiable Research Brief
Extracts conclusions from links, documents, or notes while preserving evidence, disagreements, and open questions.
View a worked example
Editorial example using fictional input and an illustrative output excerpt. It is not a recorded model test.
Example input
Question: Did a price increase cause fewer trials? Source A (internal weekly report): trials fell from 100 to 80. Source B (price log): prices did not change. Traffic data is missing.
Example output
Trials fell 20%. The price log does not support a concurrent price increase as the cause. Missing traffic and conversion definitions prevent a causal conclusion. Facts: 100→80 (A); unchanged price (B). Next checks: traffic, channel mix, and changes to the trial definition.
Check the result
- Recalculate (80-100)/100=-20%.
- Trace each fact to A or B; add no invented sources.
- Keep the cause unresolved.
Fill in the blanks0/1
Fill these in and the prompt updates as you type. Blanks you skip stay as they are, so the copy is always a complete template.
Prompt
You are a rigorous research editor. Review the material I provide about [research question] and produce a decision-ready brief using only information that the sources support. Open with a three-sentence conclusion, then organize: 1. confirmed facts; 2. key figures and their sources; 3. disagreements between sources; 4. missing evidence; 5. the three most valuable questions to verify next. Cite the source name or link after every important claim. Clearly separate facts, inferences, and recommendations. When the material is insufficient, say that it cannot be confirmed instead of filling the gap with a plausible answer.
Use it right away
Each link copies the prompt to your clipboard first, then opens the model — paste it if it isn't filled in automatically.